Interplay founder lambasts publishing model
Brian Fargo does not care to mince words about what he calls the "abysmal" treatment of developers by publishers.
In an interview with Ripten, the founder of Interplay and InExile detailed the reasons he thinks crowdfunding represents a golden opportunity for devs to break free of a negative relationship.
"There is more tension than you can believe," said Fargo.
"You would not believe the stories you hear about how developers are treated by publishers these days. It is abysmal."
Fargo has turned his back on publishers and launched a Kickstarter campaign to create a sequel to the post apocalyptic classic Wasteland has raised $1.6 million dollars.
Advertisement
This, he hopes, will help make crowdfunding even more appealing for developers, and loose the bonds that have so long held them tethered to publishers.
"Look at the most recent one with those poor guys at Obsidian," said Fargo, citing a recent example of alleged publisher abuse where Obsidian were denied a bonus because their Metacritic rating was off by a point.
"They did Fallout: New Vegas, the ship date got moved up and, who does the QA on a project? The publisher is always in charge of QA."
"When a project goes out buggy, it's not the developer. The developer never says, 'I refuse to fix the bug,' or, 'I don't know how.' They never do that. It's the publisher that does the QA, so if a product goes out buggy, it's not the developer's fault."
Fargo thinks breaking free of publishers will make games cheaper as well.
"At least 25 per cent," he claimed.
"In some cases, 35 per cent, because sometimes they insist on taking over functions like doing all the casting and audio recording, where they would spend way more than what we would, if it was our money. I mean, it is our money, because it's advances, but they insist on taking it over."
Encouraging developers to help each other out in tough times, Fargo has started a movement called "Kick it Forward", where developers raising funds on Kickstarter opt to give five per cent of their profits to future crowdfunding campaigns.
Not exactly news this, but it's true, and it's what I have been saying for years.
There are so many good things to say about developers like; they give a shit about the product, games, and gamers, they want to do a great job, they want to be proud of their work, they are decent people (for the most part), and they like to innovate.
On the other hand there are so many bad things to say about publishers like; they shaft developers; they offer shitty terms in their contracts - low royalties to developers from which they often want the dev to repay ALL the costs of development (not from their own larger share); they overspend at their end; their processes are wasteful to say the least - one month to get back to a developer on the content of a milestone...imagine a developer trying to do the same, it's laughable; they want sequels and movie tie ins and hate originality because of the risk element; they don't give a damn about gamers (check out the total lack of customer support post release); they are soulless and corporate; and what sums it all up best and proves they are abusing the industry - they usually go on to acquire developers and other publishers, when was the last time a developer bought a publisher?! Let's not get into their ever changing minds and their half baked ideas...hmm, maybe we want monkeys in this game, maybe we need some mexicans in this game...marketing says mexicans are all the rage...
The only thing keeping the industry going is the passion of each new generation, and that's what the publishers feed off, overworking, driving them insane (with their dumb decisions), and breaking each new team in turn.
Not bitter....just honest! Long live the indie developers! :)
